A high number and variety of microbes, including a high proportion of fungal pathogens, were detected.”
“Purpose: Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters inhibit restenosis after coronary and peripheral angioplasty (PCI,PTA). The aim of this study was to investigate paclitaxel plasma levels and laboratory parameters following PTA with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) in peripheral arteries.\n\nMaterials and Methods: This single treatment arm, multicenter study included

14 patients with Rutherford stage 1 – 5 with occlusions of up to 5 cm or >= 70% diameter stenosis of the superficial femoral or popliteal arteries (SFA, PA). PTA was performed using up to three PCB catheters. The paclitaxel plasma levels and safety laboratory RSL3 inhibitor parameters were determined by collecting blood samples pre-intervention,

immediately post-intervention, at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours and 1 and 4 weeks post-intervention (p.i.). Vital signs were monitored to assess clinical safety.\n\nResults: PTA was performed successfully in all patients. Paclitaxel plasma levels were always below a level and duration known to cause systemic side effects. A mean peak paclitaxel plasma level (40 ng/ml) was reached immediately p.i. and decreased rapidly below detectable levels in more than half of the patients already 2 hours p.i. The paclitaxel plasma concentrations returned to values below detectable levels at 24 hours p.i. selleck chemicals llc in all patients. Laboratory parameters and vital signs did not give any reason for safety concerns. No adverse events associated with balloon check details coating were observed.\n\nConclusion:

The results of 14 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease show no systemic bioavailability of paclitaxel >24 hours after PTA with one or more PCB catheters, indicating that the PCB catheter is safe with regard to possible systemic effects.”
“Background/Aim: Unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer with very slow tumour growth rate does not necessarily require for strong short-interval chemotherapy. In the present study, we administered monthly chemotherapy and aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the specific treatment schedule in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer with slow tumour growth rate. Patients and Methods: Since 2009, at our Institution, patients’ whose serum carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) values on the treatment day were not higher than those before initial chemotherapy, and patients who did not wish to undergo intensive chemotherapy, were prospectively scheduled for specific chemotherapy. Between January 2009 and December 2011, 10 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who received monthly chemotherapy were enrolled in the current study.